'North American Free Trade Agreement and Company Fruit\r'

'1. Why did many stuff jobs apparently migrate out of the United States in the years after the establishment of NAFTA?\r\nJobs migrated out of the United States because where the total labor for US was $10 to $12 an moment compared to rates in Mexico at $10 to $12 a day. For ex axerophtholle, the company Fruit of the Loom Inc. would hit more and emergence their revenue by paying their employee’s less to perform the job. It is also give tongue to that NAFTA was credited with helping crease increase political stability in Mexico. So this could be a nonher(prenominal) reason for the Jobs migrating out of the United States.\r\n2. Who gained from the process of adaption in the textile industry after NAFTA? Who disoriented?\r\nDue to this re valuation account in which the United States jobs migrated to Mexico had a major effect on workers in the textile mill about in the United States. But and then had a groovy benefit on consumers in the US. It stated that employment in textile mills dropped from 478,000to 239,000, employment in apparel plummeted from 858,000 to 296,000. This shows that a great amount of workers were left empty handed inquiring for new employment. But on the other hand, this ad fair(a)ment made it more reasonable for population same(p) myself.\r\nDue to textiles moving to Mexico, prices dropped on clothing. Now it makes it easier for consumers to cloud clothing at a cheaper price sooner than spending a lot of property just to do so. This shows that the market will grow because people can and willing to spend more money at the cheaper rate. In this case, Mexico and U.S will benefit. Mexico would increase jobs as low cost production moves south. And U.S will increase a prosperous market and lower the prices for consumers from goods produced in Mexico. Especially when prices are at a discounted rate.\r\n3. With hindsight, do you think it is better to protect vulnerable industries much(prenominal) as textiles, or to let them a djust to the awesome winds of change that follow entering into free parcel out agreements? What would the benefits of cost of protection be? What would the costs be?\r\nI have a two-sided mentation on this matter. I feel that in a way we should protect industries such as the textiles because jobs would be lost and wages levels would decline tremendously in the United States and Canada. Mexican workers would emigrate north and pollution would increase due to Mexico’s more unaffixed standards. And also Mexico would also lose its sovereignty which is not an important factor. But on the other hand, we shouldn’t protect because this would prosper in the market & benefit the consumers.\r\n'