David Milgaard

l Saskatoon man failed by the Canadian judge trunk The potential of an innocent person wrongfully creation intoxicateed, convicted, and punished has always been a risk and a fear on our justice system. As the justice system is handled by humans, it is bound to obtain mistakes and such errors can lead to circumstances in which an innocent is fix guilty this is c eached a miscarriage of justice. Miscarriage of justice means the calamity of a judicial system or court in the garbage disposal of justice, especially when an innocent is convicted in a crime.An example would be the wrongful credendum of David Milgaard involving the rape and murder of Gail milling machine back in 1969. The Canadian justice system failed tremendously wasted millions of dollars and confounded the public say-so of the system. More importantly, this even took away two decades of one mans life. The factors of social perception of deviance, the influence of the media, and the misconception of investigat ing patrol and prosecution play a substantial role in the resulting miscarriage of justice.The Canadian justice system did indeed fail David Milgaard because at that place was not enough legal evidence to hold him as guilty in the time since his conviction. Media of all types were a part of this miscarriage of justice as there was misinformation and facts that was cosmos spread around about David Milgaard. There is no valid tenability why media sources had to target Milgaard in the eye of the nation and say false information to the rest of the country. All the media was doing was putting fear into the sharpens of people who lived in Saskatoon.Even the police were pressured knowing that the public wanted a killer to go in to jail. The police already thought it was Milgaard, who was the one that did the raping and killing of miller except in May of 1969, Saskatoon police were getting fearful to find Millers murderer. It had already been four months since the time that she wa s polish off and since Milgaard had a bounteous history, it seemed perfect to police to verbalism at him as the suspect. At the time when Miller was slay, there were a number of opposite women who were raped throughout Saskatoon.In a coincidence, one of Millers neighbours had been sexually assaulted right after Milgaard was arrested there were newspapers that mentioned Millers murderer was peradventure responsible for up to 3 other rapes in that community that could potentially been Larry Fisher. This was just one way that the media picked on Milgaard, and the fact that the media wanted to press out some fear into the community. In the community that Gail was living in, there were posters that were affix publicly. All the posters would have a picture of Miller and just higher up that it would say MURDERER.It was just a matter of time where everything and everyone seemed to be pointing to one person, David Milgaard. Everything started to go downhill once Milgaard was arreste d. The media was the main force stool this fictitious character. The media know the in and outs of finding unique events and they try to make it like it is an everyday occurrence. The media was feeding on the fact that the community that Miller was murdered in was a quiet community. There were no crimes of this size that was make in that particular community until the day Miller was murdered.Because of this the media made it look like Milgaard a serial rapist. Since all the pressure was on Milgaard, two the community and everyone else in the country wanted him to be locked up in jail. At the time of Milgaards arrest, he was only 16 years-old, simply at the time of the trial, Milgaard was 17 years-old. Milgaard was tried as an adult. Since Milgaard was tried as an adult, this helped by comforting peoples concerns. In Milgaards conviction, the Canadian media and societys image of deviance played a major role.The professional and institutional misconduct was also held responsible for the major impairment that has fell upon Milgaard and his family. There was barely any evidence for police to arrest Milgaard. The main reason why the police arrested Milgaard was because of they thought that they saw characteristics of a crime, so they decided that a crime control approach would be needed. But clearly, there was no characteristic that was shown by Milgaard that proves that he connected a murder in any way.The Saskatoon police started an probe into Milgaards life once Albert Cadrain (a friend of Milgaards, who mentioned that Milgaard was the one who move the murder). The police wanted to find out if there was any motive as to why Miller may have been killed by Milgaard. The police were unplaced on realizing Cadrains claim. The police did recover illustration of truthful facts. Since police had a fixed mind so they decided to cut the truth. In the grant circumstances police figured Milgaard was a clear suspect.Milgaard was a teen whose appearance looks li ke a hippie and he was involved in drugs with his friends. According to Melvyn Green, Milgaard was in the eye of public and police. The police decided to neglect the truth. Police had single vision and they ignored to expand on the investigation and follow the facts which they found. So rather than investigating and discovering the true offender who has committed the act, the Saskatoon police singled Milgaard as prime suspect of the murder of Gail Miller After the trial, Milgaard was then put to life in prison for a crime that both he and his family did not do.The Crown attorney did betroth a case whose goal was totally wrong. During his time in jail, there were threefold times where Milgaard tried to get a new trial, but was rejected. While in jail, Milgaards mother tried to reopen the case multiple times it took roughly twelve years for her efforts to pay off. During those 12 years, the case eventually opened and Milgaard was then released from prison after the courts concluded that he was wrongfully convicted. Furthermore, his mother spent some of the 12 years difficult to clean Milgaards name. By doing so, his record was cleared.David Milgaard was broken down by the Canadian justice system during the time of his conviction due to insufficiency of accurate evidence claiming that he was guilty. After David Milgaard had gotten out of jail, he had lost 23 years of his life. This tragedy could have been prevented if this case was more exhaustively investigated. This is just one of the few cases that prove to show that the Canadian illegal justice system is not perfect. The publics opinion of Milgaard was heavily swayed by the media, which had a direct impact on his prison sentence.His bad behavior in high school also made him an lightsome target. These factors had a profound effect on the jurys bureau and the witness testimony. In the prosecution of the case, the trial ended in a guilty verdict due to the misconceptions that the Canadian criminal justi ce system created around the case. There were three main issues behind the wrongful conviction of David Milgaard, each and every one of these played their own role in the ruling. Work Cited CBC News. September26, 2008. Joyce Milgaard delighted by report recommendations. April 29th, 2012. CBC News. Feburary20th, 2004. Alberta judge to head up Milgaard inquiry. April30th, 2012. Ryerson University. Wrongful credits in Canada. April29th,2012. Adam, Ann, Betty. June15th, 2005. Commission of Inquiry into the Wrongful Conviction of David Milgaard. April27th, 2012. Michael Wood. November26th, 2011. Milgaard charged with assault, uttering threats. April28th, 2012. Murderpedia. Larry Fisher. April26th, 2012 Adam, Ann, Betty. January19, 2005. Commission of Inquiry Into the Wrongful Conviction of David Milgaard. May1st, 2012.