.

Monday, April 1, 2019

Public Awareness of Stroke Risk Factors and Warning Signs

Public Awareness of Stroke Risk Factors and Warning Signs innovationStroke is defined as a sudden neurological shortage cause by impairment in perfusion to the brain (M. Bornstein, N 2009). The WHO estimates that by course of instruction 2030, 80% of all blastoffs provide occur in low and mettle income countries and high quality of wellness statistics are essential for planning and implementing health policy in all countries.Of all neurological unsoundnesss, shock is the near preven duck. The need to increase unexclusive consciousness of stroke stake factors and word of advice fall guys has been place as critical to addressing the large gaps in knowledge. An important verbal expression of upward(a) cause of stroke was to prevent strokes from occurring in the first place, by increasing populace awareness of the risk of infection factors (Britain, G 2009). Act F.A.S.T(face, arm, speech, time) melt was laughed and organized by MOH in most of the countries and which ha s been effective in improving the publics deferred payment of the symptoms of stroke . thither are a lot of queryes had been done to know the effectiveness of campaign and programs. This paper exit revaluation ii articles to quiz the stroke awareness and risk factors in general nation.MethodsTwo articles were chosen from Bio Med commutation, using key words of stroke, awareness, risk factors, exemplification signs. The criteria were established with articles of info collection strategies, identification of the main pick out, practiced text and up to date published in amid 2007 to 2008. abstractionistThe abstract is a brief description of the examine placed at the beginning of the article about 100 to 150 words and it allows readers to prize whether to read the in full articles of the report (POLIT, D. F., BECK, C. T 2010). both(prenominal) articles illustrate background knowledge objective, method, results and conclusions in one paragraph distinctly and concise, w hich stimulates the reader to read full articles. In (W Wahab, K. et al. 2008) article, germ conducted the cross subdivisional study of force to aim one risk factor of stroke warning sign at Irrua Specialist Teaching Hospital in southern Nigeria whereas in (Hickey, A. et al. 2009) article, detect lack of public awareness about stroke warning signs and risk factors which contribute to reducing mortality and morbidity from stroke.Introduction/Research problems undefeated fundraising professionals reveal that only 10 percent of their time is actually spent soliciting major gifts whereas the other 90 percent is spent look intoing prospects and developing strategies. For that contend, it is super important for an organization to allocate resources to establish a prospect search program (Ciconte, B. and Jacob, J 2009).(BASTABLE, S. B. 2006) said an creation should provide the reader with an understanding of how the study fits into what is already kn admit about the research to pic and provides a justification as why this particular piece of research is important. Central phenomena, concepts, the study purpose, the hypotheses (POLIT, D. F., BECK, C. T. 2010) were briefly exposit in these two articles.In Hickey, A. et al. (2009) article, the causality has discussed needs of increase public awareness of stroke risk factors and warning signs in older adults, at higher risk for stroke with applicable references and the study was conducted across two jurisdictions the republic of Ireland and northern Ireland.In (W Wahab, K. et al2008) article, author has discussed due to the spite of high case fatality rate from stroke in Nigeria, the study was intentional to assess the knowledge of warning signs in affected roles with hypertension, diabetes mellitus or both conditions that are modifiable risk factors for stroke.Research headland two articles have been introduced in a general look at the end of the introduction, it is worth restating it before the metho ds section to refocus the readers attention though there is no actual research point is posted nor hypothesis.Literature review(Gliner, J. and Morgan, G 2000) explained that in most journals, the introduction and literature review are together in one section which is untitled in APA format, but some journals will separate these two titles. As can see, there are no subtitles of literature review in these two articles. til now, the reader felt that both articles apply patriarchal sources briefly summarize the existing knowledge, which provided a state of evidence and unhurt basic. Some of the studies mentioned in the literature review for both articles were consider up to date as the oldest reference is dated as 1998.Research startBoth articles, study were conducted using questionnaire by interviewers. In Anne article mentioned the reason why this approach was adopted.(POLIT, D. F., BECK, C. T 2010) stated that quantitative researchers use some(prenominal) criteria to assess t he quality of a study, referred to as its scientific merit. Quantitative research is identified with traditional scientific method that gathers data objectively in an organized, systematic, controlled manner so that the determinations can be generalized to other situations, population which can find in these two articles.Research DesignBoth articles used experimental research which maintains the greatest control over the research linguistic contexts and takes the form of randomized controlled trails (RTC) where participants are randomly selected into the different groupings. The RTC is generally considered the luxurious standard of study designs (Kirch, W 2008). In (Hickey, A. et al 2009) article, study gnarly a cross sectional survey of randomly selected society establish older people in the republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland. (Houser, J 2012) run alongd that the quantitative studies, the design will detail how the subject will be selected and assigned to groups, the wa y the intervention will be applied, a standard strategy, and a plan for data analysis. Ethic approval has been granted and informed consent was provided in both articles.SampleIn both articles, researches used simple random sample distribution, which is the most basis form of probability sampling (REIS, H. T., JUDD, C. M 2000). The sample size was enough in these two studies. However (Offredy, M. and Vicker, P 2010) concludes that there are no simple rules we can cave in that is the correct size sample for the research. Sample size depends largely on aims and purpose of the research, as well as the current time and methodological analysis used to undertake the research study (SMART, J. C. 2009).In (W Wahab, K. et al 2008) article, the study was conducted at the Irrua specialist teaching hospital from January to march 2007 with 225 eligible patients was approached for the study. wholly participants were recruited with a diagnosis of hypertension, diabetes mellitus or both were i nterviewed about knowledge of stroke warning signs by attending doctors.In (Hickey, A. et al 2009) article, the study gnarled 2033 participants of a cross sectional survey of randomly selected aged of 65 + in the republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland. Interviews were conducted in participants own homes asking knowledge and warning signs of stroke by trained commercialise researchers. This article did not mention duration of the study has been conducted. Both articles stated ethical considerations and consent taken.Data Collection and AnalysisIn both articles, the researchers used the questionnaire that was used and re corrected in pilot study to collect the data. In (Hickey, A. et al 2009) article, no information is given as when the data was collected. But the researcher has clearly explained the appropriateness of the methods and survey data was statistically adjusted prior to analysis to avoid dominance bend. descriptive and comparative analyses were carried out using the Stata interpreting 8.2. The chi square test was used to examine differences between the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland in recognition of stroke risk factors and warning signs. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the effects of demographic variables and the presence of risk factors on stroke.In (W Wahab, K. et al 2008)article, researcher excluded those who participated in the pilot and history of stroke to avoid solidus as they have been primed to seek for information. Researcher failed to describe the appropriateness of methods. Data was crushd with statistical package for the social sciences version 11( SPSS Inc), a very widely used computer program designed to aid the statistical analysis of data in the course of research (KEMP, R., SNELGAR, R 2006) , means and standard deviations were jibed. Means were compared using Chi-Square Test to take apart variances. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was done to determine independent predictor of abi lity to identify warning sign from among service line variables.Reliability and ValidityValidity is the one if the obtained results are truthful and believable. In order to determine the validity, the researcher generally poses a series of questions, and will often look for the answers in the research of others to know the measurements accurately.( Kirk and Miller 1986) identified three types of reliability referred to in quantitative research, which relates to (1) producing the same(p) results under same measurement conditions (2) the stability of a measurement with respect to time and (3) the law of similarity of measurements in a given time period. This has not been discussed by the researchers in both articles.ResultsOverall, both articles results was statistically analyzed and presented in a way that average reader could understand. Tables are clear and promote clarity of the text. (Hickey, A. et al 2009) articles table 1 showed significant demographic differences between the s amples. Adjusted odds ratio analysis indicates that higher levels of knowledge were significantly associated with having second level procreation or grater and geographic location. Less than half of the population correctly identified stroke risk factors in table 2.In (W Wahab, K. et al 2008) article, table 1 results showed that primary education was the highest educational attainment in 30.2% of the respondents. In table 2, no warning sign was identified by 60.4% while 39.6% was one sign identified. Gender (Male), 11 or more years of education emerged as the independent predictors of ability to identify at least one warning sign in table 3 on multiple logistic regression analysis. preachingIn(W Wahab, K. et al 2008) article, the authors have interpreted the findings and made comparisons with India, Australia and Developed countries studies. The authors have discussed the finding related to research questions, aim clearly and stated that their study has potential limitations as i ts cross sectional and hospital based nature that the results might not be completely generalized to the community. They also suggested for further community based study to ascertain the generalizability of their results and there is no obvious bias seen in the discussion.In (Hickey, A. et al 2009) article, the discussions were clearly explained the findings related to research hypotheses and analyze with US and mass media campaigns to be more effective. Limitations of their study is possible bias however the research team sought to minimize the possibility by having all interviewers receive the same training and work from a regularise script. Also suggested that need more longitudinal study investment in future. The authors had brought attentions to the topic Health Service in UK system to provide a similar program me in Republic of Irelands.ConclusionThe authors had suggested the need for real(a) population health education with regard to stroke prevention and charge is critic al to a future reduction in Anne article. Recommendations were clear, relate to findings and further for further study in (Hickey, A. et al 2009) article.In (W Wahab, K. et al 2008) article,conclusion were mentioned clearly includes the finding, suggestions related to aims. Also recommended to do regular community education programs by means of mass media, radio and television using the appropriate local language. Both articles references were accurate and well written for overall.ImplementationTime is brain, May is the National stroke awareness month, a month dedicated to raise awareness about the nations fourth leading cause of shoemakers last and disability (Stroke.org 2013). This annual event is sponsored by the National Stroke Association, think to engage individuals, community organizations and business in the effort to educate the public about how to prevent stroke through risk factor management, receipt to stroke symptoms and spread hope from stroke recovery.I am runni ng(a) in an acute local hospital medical unit specialized of gastro logy and neurology. From my experiences, most of the family members are not aware of stroke. Today, patient education is a topic of significant interest to take holds in every setting in which they practice. As teaching is a major aspect of nurses professional role, I do explore information to patient or family members regarding the stroke and awareness of stroke, risk factors provide with booklet from the hospital. There are also stroke specialize nurses in my hospital, who are good-looking moral support, needs for the patients and family members. Health promotion role of hospital nurses was to try the need to influence, and help patients modify health beliefs and lifestyle together with disease related teaching (Piper, S 2009)The focus of care is on outcomes that turn out the extent to which patients and their significant other have learned the knowledge and skills essential for independent living (BASTABLE, S. B. 2006). It is important for every nurse to teach public and learning will continue to increase in this era of healthcare reform.

No comments:

Post a Comment